Home > Not Working > Firefox Max-width Not Working

Firefox Max-width Not Working


Are you seeing this problem in developer edition or nightly? Isn't the BBC being extremely irresponsible in describing how to authenticate an account-related email? leo metus, aliquam eget convallis eget, molestie at massa.

[Update] As stated by mVChr below, the w3.org spec states that max-width does not apply to inline elements. This does however work fine in Chrome. this contact form

Here's a part of the code for the set_content:
@media only screen and (min-width: 90em) {
.set_content {
width: 50%;
font-size: 150%;
padding: 2em 10%;

Firefox Max-width Not Working

I found this out from the following source: http://ss64.com/css/max-width.html share|improve this answer answered Nov 18 '15 at 22:39 atwixtor 485620 Fantastic! I have tried setting a max width on the divs, tried changing the display types, but nothing works. The img tag doesn't have any styles applied except from responsive.css and @media print. –Brian Graham Jun 5 '13 at 18:00 Hey did you find an answer? –Nazar Tokar

  • max-content 22.0 -webkit 46.0 [1] 3.0 (1.9)-moz ? 15 -webkit 2.0 (421) (intrinsic value) 6.1 -webkit min-content 22.0 [4] -webkit 46.0 [1] 3.0 (1.9) -moz ? 15 -webkit 2.0 (421) (min-intrinsic
  • content-box If present, the preceding or is applied to the element's content box.
  • Staying on track when learning theory vs learning to play Mimsy were the Borogoves - why is "mimsy" an adjective?
  • Is RandomGraph really random?

its container no longer shrinks past a certain point, due to the way Bootstrap's responsive styles are set up. This is an issue with scaling using max-width. In Firefox or IE, shrink the page to below 432px and you will see that the images do not follow max-width anymore (while above 764px they do). Firefox Responsive Images Max Width How to handle swear words in quote / transcription?

Browse other questions tagged css firefox or ask your own question. Firefox Table Cell Width Not the answer you're looking for? It's for limiting the responsiveness to go beyond 1000px. –Manik Arora Jan 28 '14 at 13:49 Lol, you have too, otherwise your website won't be responsive at all. –Romain http://stackoverflow.com/questions/21407031/max-width100-not-working-on-images-in-mozilla Has a movie ever referred to a later movie?

Thanks! –Ilya Karnaukhov Apr 14 '13 at 15:52 This recommendation solved my issue as well. Max Width 100 Not Working Build me a brick wall! it's been a busy week! Thanks.

Firefox Table Cell Width

http://yellow-bull.bplaced.net/ If I open this site in Chrome, everything looks nice and as it should. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16946633/css-image-max-width-not-working-in-firefox-and-ie prntscr.com/a6u67f –Ferrrmolina Feb 23 at 7:56 I've edited my question and added an image of my problem: oi65.tinypic.com/11ijq7p.jpg The image is simply too wide. –Dandy Feb 23 at 8:05 Firefox Max-width Not Working My site looks just fine in Safari and Chrome, but because of this issue, Firefox simply won't render it correctly. Firefox Width 100 Not Working This is a scaling issue and fixed width immediately disables scaling on those elements.

that's a huge problem. weblink Did the GoF really thoroughly explore "Pattern Space"? Possible repercussions from assault between coworkers outside the office Should I have doubts if the organizers of a workshop ask me to sign a behavior agreement upfront? Actual results: Image doesn't scale down. Display Table Not Working In Firefox

asked 6 years ago viewed 48919 times active 1 year ago Upcoming Events 2016 Community Moderator Election ends in 9 days Linked 14 Responsive images in tables (bootstrap 3) 2 Max-width Seems like the other browsers are doing something along these lines. I'll update the code. –Sloth Armstrong Jul 15 '14 at 23:07 Also to clarify - I need to use inline-block as the display. navigate here http://jsfiddle.net/hzngg2n6/4/ Comment 28 Andreas Hennings 2015-08-11 09:05:06 PDT Sorry, I did not realize that the fiddle by Mark Otto contains bootstrap.

As it took me some time to find out, I just thought let's share this if it can avoid others to loose time on this !!! Table Max Width 100% Today on ebay with Bug 1095359. fill Use the fill-available inline size or fill-available block size, as appropriate to the writing mode.

img {position:relative;}?

This is the correct fiddle with explicit width: 100% on the image, and legend: http://jsfiddle.net/m7a07p1y/ And here with min-width: 100% on the image: http://jsfiddle.net/ov3158zj/ Comment 29 Francesco 2015-08-17 09:18:03 PDT (In Categories CSS Combat JavaScript Jungle Design Den Back End Other Discussions We have a pretty good* newsletter. Use max-width and max-height in vw and vh: max-width: 90vw; What means the image will have max 90% of visible width. Moz-max-content It is built on WordPress, hosted by Media Temple, and the assets are served by MaxCDN.

You're going to have to tinker with it, honestly, to get a look that works for you and is still usable. –Jason M. It uses targeting for FF only, the older width: 100% fix, and an additional experimental property. I solved my issue by saying .class a: { max-width: 100%;} –raiderrobert Oct 30 '15 at 13:09 In my opinion, in this case (max-width:100%) it should act like the his comment is here I am at a loss with this one so any help is greatly appreciated.

So max-width:100%, inside a table cell ends up being the natural width of the content in most cases. more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Of course, this is js-dependent, but nowadays should be more than OK. [email protected] NewAccount | Log In or Remember [x] | Forgot Password Login: [x] Home | New | Browse | Search | [help] | Reports | Product Dashboard Persona is no longer

Should I report it? Your HTML has a fixed width and therefore isn't valid for this issue. The goal is to have one div positioned at the top of the parent div, one at the bottom, and one stretching across the remaining space:

some Next, you render the table cells whose content size is known or can be calculated and is less than the max-width and set their widths (unless they are already set).

The lower part (bellow the nav) keeps centered and have the same width as the upper part (header). The diffrence between width and max-width is very important when working with images. How can I claim compensation? Gud Luck share|improve this answer answered Apr 25 '14 at 6:31 user3571737 11 add a comment| up vote 0 down vote For my issue (and using a bootstrap derivative), I didn't

And who are »they«? asked 2 years ago viewed 1701 times active 2 years ago Upcoming Events 2016 Community Moderator Election ends in 9 days Related 1112Make div 100% height of browser window8CSS: table {width:100%; more hot questions question feed default about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation But, if removing "float: left" on div id "primary" and also removing the "max-width" on div id container, it seems to work better (at least in Safari).

magnus_vb # December 20, 2012 at 2:09 pm Hey Webster I'm not sure this will solve your problem. Polyglot Anagrams Cops' Thread Quine Anagrams! (Cops' Thread) Code ladder, Robbers Music notation software for ubuntu Encasing a star in a perfect insulator Mimsy were the Borogoves - why is "mimsy" Comment 37 Boris Zbarsky [:bz] (still a bit busy) 2016-03-04 17:54:02 PST Jason, this bug is fixed by the fix for bug 823483 which was checked into the development tree for How can I safely handle a concentrated (fuming) nitric acid spill?

width forces the image to be that width, no matter if that will make much bigger than its resolution (what will look nasty in most cases). Not the answer you're looking for?